It seems like everyone is falling all over themselves today declaring that Nest, a “learning thermostat” is next best thing since sliced bread.
The idea is interesting, and the design is quite attractive. Heck, I kind of want one.  So what’s my beef?
I think it’s more than a little disingenuous to claim that this device will have any significant impact on overall energy consumption in the US.  A thermostat can be had for under $20.00.  Nest costs $250.00. The price virtually guarantees that it will live mostly in the domain of gadget / design enthusiasts.  
If the Nest team was really interested in making a dent in energy consumption, they would be aiming for a much lower price to make sure it gets into as many homes as possible. Instead, they’re putting out a premium product at a premium price in order to make money. There’s nothing wrong with that, but spare me the “we’re going to save the planet” speech.

It seems like everyone is falling all over themselves today declaring that Nest, a “learning thermostat” is next best thing since sliced bread.

The idea is interesting, and the design is quite attractive. Heck, I kind of want one.  So what’s my beef?

I think it’s more than a little disingenuous to claim that this device will have any significant impact on overall energy consumption in the US.  A thermostat can be had for under $20.00.  Nest costs $250.00. The price virtually guarantees that it will live mostly in the domain of gadget / design enthusiasts.  

If the Nest team was really interested in making a dent in energy consumption, they would be aiming for a much lower price to make sure it gets into as many homes as possible. Instead, they’re putting out a premium product at a premium price in order to make money. There’s nothing wrong with that, but spare me the “we’re going to save the planet” speech.

17 notes

Show

  1. mudblood reblogged this from stoddard
  2. stoddard posted this